Bunker Hill School
170 Bunker Hill Ave
Waterbury CT, 06708, New Haven County
Phone: 203-574-8183
Ranking: (646 out of 765, bottom 16%)*
Type: Regular Primary School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Prekindergarten to Grade 5
School District: Waterbury School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 32 | 32 | 32 | 31 | 32 | 38 | 32 | |||||||
Total Students: | 514 | 505 | 497 | 486 | 491 | 522 | 519 | |||||||
Prekindergarten: | 18 | 3.5% | 20 | 4.0% | 19 | 3.8% | 19 | 3.9% | 21 | 4.3% | 18 | 3.4% | 18 | 3.5% |
Kindergarten: | 98 | 19.1% | 100 | 19.8% | 109 | 21.9% | 98 | 20.2% | 86 | 17.5% | 103 | 19.7% | 92 | 17.7% |
Grade 1: | 94 | 18.3% | 88 | 17.4% | 75 | 15.1% | 70 | 14.4% | 82 | 16.7% | 79 | 15.1% | 84 | 16.2% |
Grade 2: | 75 | 14.6% | 77 | 15.2% | 67 | 13.5% | 77 | 15.8% | 65 | 13.2% | 85 | 16.3% | 81 | 15.6% |
Grade 3: | 76 | 14.8% | 62 | 12.3% | 77 | 15.5% | 66 | 13.6% | 78 | 15.9% | 71 | 13.6% | 83 | 16.0% |
Grade 4: | 67 | 13.0% | 79 | 15.6% | 69 | 13.9% | 79 | 16.3% | 71 | 14.5% | 84 | 16.1% | 79 | 15.2% |
Grade 5: | 86 | 16.7% | 79 | 15.6% | 81 | 16.3% | 77 | 15.8% | 88 | 17.9% | 82 | 15.7% | 82 | 15.8% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 272 | 52.9% | 261 | 51.7% | 257 | 51.7% | 247 | 50.8% | 240 | 48.9% | 256 | 49.0% | 253 | 48.7% |
Female: | 242 | 47.1% | 244 | 48.3% | 240 | 48.3% | 239 | 49.2% | 243 | 49.5% | 258 | 49.4% | 262 | 50.5% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 1 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.6% | 4 | 0.8% | 2 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 14 | 2.7% | 10 | 2.0% | 9 | 1.8% | 2 | 0.4% | 11 | 2.2% | 15 | 2.9% | 8 | 1.5% |
Hispanic: | 249 | 48.4% | 234 | 46.3% | 229 | 46.1% | 209 | 43.0% | 196 | 39.9% | 203 | 38.9% | 234 | 45.1% |
Black: | 130 | 25.3% | 145 | 28.7% | 149 | 30.0% | 166 | 34.2% | 163 | 33.2% | 170 | 32.6% | 152 | 29.3% |
White: | 102 | 19.8% | 101 | 20.0% | 100 | 20.1% | 96 | 19.8% | 119 | 24.2% | 132 | 25.3% | 125 | 24.1% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 18 | 3.5% | 12 | 2.4% | 7 | 1.4% | 9 | 1.9% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 433 | 84.2% | 400 | 79.2% | 395 | 79.5% | 393 | 80.9% | 360 | 73.3% | 347 | 66.5% | 365 | 70.3% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 29 | 5.6% | 29 | 5.7% | 34 | 6.8% | 26 | 5.3% | 56 | 11.4% | 75 | 14.4% | 66 | 12.7% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.32 | 16.03 | 15.78 | 15.93 | 15.54 | 15.40 | 16.00 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
CMT | ||||||
2006 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 62.8% | 63.8% | 78.3% |
2007 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 66.2% | 67.5% | 80.1% |
2008 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 73.2% | 70% | 80.7% |
2009 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 77.2% | 82.8% |
2010 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 74.4% | 83.6% |
2011 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 79.4% | 84.3% |
2012 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 75.5% | 85.8% |
2013 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 69.8% | 82.7% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 47.4% | 46.5% | 69.2% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 29.7% | 45.1% | 69.3% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 51.2% | 49.2% | 68.4% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 60.3% | 55% | 71.1% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 48.4% | 53.8% | 72.3% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 45.5% | 60.6% | 74% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 53% | 54.1% | 74.5% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50.8% | 52.8% | 72.4% |
2006 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 73% | 81.7% |
2007 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 74.3% | 72.1% | 82.4% |
2008 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76.5% | 72.1% | 82.9% |
2009 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 76.1% | 83.2% |
2010 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 65.7% | 80.3% |
2011 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 61.6% | 72.4% | 81.1% |
2012 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63.9% | 75.9% | 83.2% |
2013 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 56.1% | 65.5% | 80.4% |
2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.4% | 64.9% | 80.3% |
2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.1% | 66.7% | 80.9% |
2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 71.1% | 69.4% | 81.5% |
2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 74.5% | 84.6% |
2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.7% | 77.5% | 85.2% |
2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 79.2% | 85.2% |
2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.3% | 75.4% | 85.8% |
2013 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 74.6% | 69.9% | 83.8% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 45.6% | 49.4% | 71.8% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 38.4% | 45.3% | 70.6% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 33.7% | 47.4% | 69.7% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 51.2% | 53.1% | 74.4% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 55.4% | 52.2% | 72.9% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 58.6% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 45% | 61.2% | 78.3% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 62.9% | 59.4% | 77.6% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 76% | 84.2% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 75% | 73.1% | 84.1% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.7% | 74.6% | 84.8% |
2009 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 76.1% | 85% |
2010 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 74% | 77.4% | 86.5% |
2011 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.7% | 74.6% | 85.4% |
2012 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 63.2% | 72.2% | 83.7% |
2013 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 62.2% | 72.8% | 83.5% |
2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 55.3% | 64.8% | 80.8% |
2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.7% | 71.1% | 82.5% |
2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 73% | 83.1% |
2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 78.2% | 85.9% |
2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 87% | 82.6% | 87.8% |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 81.9% | 87.6% |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.3% | 69.5% | 85.7% |
2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.1% | 70.1% | 84.4% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 42.1% | 47.9% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 44.7% | 51.4% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 41.5% | 53.2% | 74% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 40.8% | 59.9% | 77.7% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.2% | 58.2% | 75.4% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 46.8% | 58.3% | 75.1% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.9% | 58.7% | 79.7% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 49.1% | 59.3% | 79.1% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 42.7% | 58.4% | 81.1% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 53.6% | 63.8% | 82.9% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 69% | 64.4% | 82.5% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 53.4% | 62% | 82.4% |
2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 47.5% | 58.3% | 82.4% |
2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 41.3% | 62.5% | 81.7% |
2006 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.8% | 74.2% | 85.3% |
2007 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 73.7% | 85.7% |
2008 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 72% | 70.3% | 85.7% |
2009 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 75.7% | 86.5% |
2010 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.2% | 75.7% | 87.3% |
2011 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 78.8% | 88% |
2012 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 78.7% | 88.5% |
2013 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 74.7% | 75.9% | 87.7% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Bunker Hill School was rated 1.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.